Offerings in the Cells
By Mario Vega
When we started our work with small groups in houses, we began to wonder about the offerings subject. Was it appropriate to collect
offerings in the cells? There were two positions: one from brothers who thought offerings should be collected and the other from those who thought it was not a good idea if the main purpose was the evangelization.
Those who thought offerings should be collected supported their position stating that this subject is part of the gospel and, consequently, the gospel had to be presented as it was. Those who thought was not appropriate claimed that guests could get the impression that we were only interested in money. Others thought it could generate the idea that the snack was being charged.
Finally, others thought that it was not right to let leaders and supervisors handle the churches´ money.
Both positions had their valid reasons. At that time, we did not have a clear idea about the whole meaning of the cell work. Our only reference was Pastor Cho´s model.
In his books, Pastor Cho made repeated references on the fact of collecting offerings in his meetings. Therefore, we decided to follow the Korean model and set the offering as part of the home meeting program.
In the subsequent years, experience has taught us that collecting offerings was a good decision. Now we are sure that cells are a very effective way for not only achieving evangelization and growth goals but also economic ones. About that, I will write later on.
Comments?
Mario Vega
Translation in Spanish:
¿Qué sobre las ofrendas?
Cuando iniciamos nuestro trabajo con grupos pequeños en casas comenzamos a preguntarnos sobre el tema de las ofrendas. ¿Era conveniente recoger ofrendas en las células? Existían dos posiciones: la de los hermanos que pensaban que se debía recoger ofrendas y la de los que pensaban que no era una buena idea si el propósito principal era la evangelización.
Quienes pensaban que se debía recoger ofrendas sustentaban su posición expresando que el tema de las ofrendas es parte del evangelio y, consecuentemente, se debía presentar el evangelio tal como era. Los que pensaban que no era conveniente, argumentaban que los invitados podían llevarse la idea que lo único que nos interesaba era el tema económico. Otros pensaban que se podía generar la idea que se estaba cobrando por el refrigerio. Finalmente, otros pensaban que no era sano dejar que los líderes y supervisores manejaran dinero de la iglesia.
Ambas posiciones tenían sus razones valederas. En ese tiempo, no teníamos una idea clara sobre todo lo que significaba el trabajo con células. Nuestro único referente era el modelo del Pastor Cho.
En sus libros, el Pastor Cho hacía repetidas referencias al hecho que en sus reuniones se recogían ofrendas. Decidimos entonces seguir el modelo coreano y establecimos la ofrenda como parte del programa de la reunión en casa.
En los años posteriores la experiencia nos enseñó que el recoger ofrendas fue una buena decisión. Ahora estamos seguros que las células son un medio muy eficaz no solamente para alcanzar metas de evangelización y crecimiento sino también económicas. Pero, de ello, escribiré más adelante.

by Rob Campbell
“All the students I brought last year to your cell church course have failed to put the teaching into practice,” the bishop’s assistant said during the
last day of the church planter’s course in Nyack, New York. Robert works for the conservative Episcopalian diocese in Albany, New York. For the second year, Robert has brought priests to my May seminary course at Alliance Theological Seminary. He loves cell ministry and wants the priests in his diosee to catch the same vision.
Jeff Tunnell here, filling in for Joel Comiskey who is ministering in New York. Early on in transitioning our congregation from Traditional to Cell-based structure, we confronted the issue of building a training track (equipping
track for discipling new believers into future leaders). Being a small congregation, resources in both manpower and funds were equally small. Like many we ADOPTED someone else’s model and pre-printed materials. As we continued to transition, the publisher of our adopted materials began changing them radically and frequently which led to our frustration. This was due to the belief that any fruitfulness would come from following the “model” exactly and that any change would weaken its inherent strength and wisdom. Ouch!
some of the questions I made myself when starting our cell model. This work with cells came in response of an evangelism need. At least, I was clear about the evangelist purpose of our small groups in houses.