Finding Solutions that Help

joelCriticism comes easily. Solutions are far harder. D.L. Moody once responded to his critics by saying, “I like what I’m doing better than what you’re not BEAUTYdoing.” 

One of the key thrusts of JCG is to offer solutions. We want to be a non-profit organization that takes the theory down to where pastors and leaders live and work. We believe in the radical middle of cell church ministry. Yes, we believe in radical, outside-the-box type New Testament ministry. Yet, we want to avoid the “I’m better than you are” mentality that is the natural result of putting others down. 

I’m referring here to the the need to find cell solutions that work in the battle–rather than offering criticisms that go nowhere. 

Yes, we’ll all fail and struggle along the road. Yet, I think God wants us to strive to find solutions that will help Christ’s church rather than tear it down.

What do you think? What has been your experience in this area?

 

Joel Comiskey

Testing the Model

marioby Mario Vega

By the year of 1989, Elim church had reached a cells´ attendance that already exceeded 25,000 people. During all of this time, around eight years El testSalvador had been plunged into a civil war. The military situation had reached a stagnation point and the warring parties efforts´ for a peace dialogue didn’t prosper.

Under these conditions, the guerrilla decided to launch a strong offensive in order to show their military power and force the dialogue between the parties. The offensive was planned for the country’s main cities, but with much more emphasis on the capital city.

One day before the attacks the insurgents began to meet under the most unexpected ways: there were weddings going on where both weren’t really the bride and groom and guests were all fighters with the perfect excuse for meeting without being noticed, there were supposedly relatives keeping watch, mourning around a coffin that had no deceased in it but rifles and other weapons. Some testify to have seen trucks loaded with ‘evangelicals’ singing traditional hymns without recognizing anyone. In deed they were fighters entering the cities.

Despite of being the largest military operation of the war that covered the national territory, that mobilized thousands of fighters and took a little over a year of planning, it was handled with such secrecy that was not perceived by the state’s intelligence. Everything would begin on Saturday, November 16, 1989, at sunset. But not only the army was surprised, also those 25,000 people who precisely on Saturdays, at dusk, met in our cells. They didn’t know that a meeting planned to last one hour that day, would keep them in the hosts´ houses for more than a week.
Would the cell work survive such a trial?

Mario

Spanish translation:

El modelo bajo prueba.

Para el año de 1989, la iglesia Elim haba alcanzado una asistencia en células que ya sobrepasaba las 25,000 personas. Todo ese tiempo El Salvador haba estado inmerso en una guerra civil que llevaba ya ocho años. La situación militar haba llegado a un punto de estancamiento y los esfuerzos de las partes en conflicto por un diálogo hacia la paz no prosperaban.

En esas condiciones, la guerrilla decidió lanzar una fuerte ofensiva con el propósito de mostrar su poder militar y forzar el diálogo entre las partes. La ofensiva se planeó para las principales ciudades del pas, pero, con mucho énfasis en la ciudad capital.

Los insurgentes comenzaron a reunirse un da antes de los ataques de las maneras más inesperadas: hubo bodas donde tanto el novio como la novia no lo eran en realidad y los invitados eran todos combatientes con la excusa perfecta para agruparse sin ser percibidos, hubo velorios donde supuestos familiares lamentaban alrededor de un ataúd que no tena ningún difunto sino fusiles y otras armas. Algunos testifican haber visto camiones yendo cargados de ‘evangélicos’ cantando alabanzas tradicionales pero sin que nadie los conociera.
En realidad eran combatientes entrando a las ciudades.

A pesar de tratarse de la operación militar más grande de la guerra y que abarcaba el territorio nacional, que movilizaba a millares de combatientes y que llevaba un poco más de un año de planificación, se manejó con tal secretismo que no fue percibida por la inteligencia del estado.
Todo comenzara el sábado 16 de noviembre de 1989, al caer el sol. Pero, no solamente fue sorprendido el ejército sino también esas 25,000 personas que precisamente los sábados, al atardecer, se reunan en nuestras células. Ese da no saban que una reunión planeada para durar una hora, los mantendra en casa de los anfitriones por más de una semana. ¿Sobrevivira el trabajo celular semejante prueba?

More on Fast-tracking

by Steve Cordle

Thanks to Jeff Tunnel for filling in for me last week! He prompted a great question about whether it is ever OK to fast-track people into leadership. When we have a defined equipping track, is there ever a time we should let people start leading a cell without completing it, or fulfilling requirements like church membership. Let me spin off that question for a moment.

Personally, I don’t allow someone to start leading who has not gone through our membership class and taken the membership vow. Why? Most people don’t avoid membership because it’s meaningless – they avoid it because of what it means. If they know we ask leaders to be members (and therefore know and agree with the church’s vision and values), their refusal to do so indicates they will not be good ambassadors of our vision and values.

However, in recent years there have been several times I have encouraged people who haven’t completed the equipping track to start leading anyway – provided they commit to going through the equipping track while they get started. Coaches can provide on the spot instruction and encouragement. I’m comfortable with this as it allows non-linear growth.

I believe one can fast-track learning, to an extent. What one cannot fast-track is discipleship and spiritual growth. So the main question for me is not whether the person has been through the equipping track (we can take care of that in lots of ways), but rather, how solid are they spiritually? We don’t want to “lay hands on someone too hastily.”

The times I have regretted fast-tracking someone are not the equipping track flexes, but rather when someone starts out of the gate spiritually fast and I move them into leadership, only to find their spiritual immaturity comes back to bite me.

When is a person spiritually ready? It’s hard to quantify, but a good equipping track gives the time, experiences and the learning which promote that readiness. One can make the case that someone’s refusal to submit to membership indicates aimmaturity (or woundedness) that one wouldn’t want to spread. The desire to start serving right away is great – but a truly mature person will  understand the need to walk through the process. They can also start evangelizing, discipling, and serving in the group context even before they are a leader.
Steve

Got Conflict?

by Rob Campbell

www.cypresscreekchurch.com

One must work through the complex to get to the simple.  Read that first sentence again and reflect upon its meaning for just a moment.  Now, think with me how complex, overwhelming the scriptures can be for you and me.  Frankly, there are some pretty confusing facets of the scriptures that require much thought, study, and appropriate understanding of history.  But, Jesus helps us to move from the complex to the simple.  Check out this example.

Read Matthew 22:37-40.  Simply put, this text implores us to love God and man.  Notice the vertical and horizontal relationships that are highlighted in the words of Christ.  Indeed, effective ministry is hinged to love via our relationship with God and others.

Relationships have the propensity to be life-giving.  There are as well some relational land mines like CONFLICT.  Notice the following three observations about conflict:

Conflict is unavoidable

Conflict is difficult

How we handle conflict determines our success

Successful relationships; therefore, hinge on one’s ability to understand the causes of conflict.  Here are a few examples:

Human Nature (“Cain had a problem with God, but he took it out on his brother”)

Divisive People (No matter where they are, they sow discord)

Hurting People (Hurting people hurt people)

Political People (Controlling people usually cause conflict)

Poor Leadership

Now, let’s return to the two greatest commandments.  Love God and love others.  Are you a person that can be used of God to bring restoration to conflicting relationships?  You bet you are!  You see, every cell will one day face conflict.  It is inevitable.  Successful resolution of conflict opens the door for a deeper relationship.  Avoiding conflict resolution only exasperates the problem.  Deal with the conflict using Matthew 22:37-40 as your motivation.

Comments?